Every year, as the mercury begins its slow climb, the great footwear migration begins. We pack away the sturdy boots and confining trainers, dreaming of something lighter, more breathable—a shoe that embodies the freedom of summer itself. My own journey has been fraught with disappointment. I’ve tried flimsy flip-flops that offer zero support and lead to aching arches after a single afternoon stroll. I’ve stubbornly worn trainers on hot days, only to end up with uncomfortably sweaty feet. The ideal, I’ve always thought, is a hybrid: the open, airy feel of a sandal with the secure footing and cushioned support of a proper shoe. This is the promise of the fisherman sandal, a design that has endured for its practicality. It’s this very promise that led me to test the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal, a product that, on the surface, seems to tick all the right boxes with its famous Memory Foam and “Relaxed Fit.” But as I discovered, the story is far more complex.
What to Consider Before Buying Walking Sandals
A pair of walking sandals is more than just summer footwear; it’s a key solution for staying comfortable, supported, and cool during warmer months, holidays, or casual outings. They solve the fundamental problem of wanting to keep your feet ventilated without sacrificing the structural integrity needed for walking any significant distance. The main benefits are clear: improved breathability to prevent overheating and sweating, casual style that pairs well with summer attire, and easy-on, easy-off convenience. Without a good pair, you risk discomfort, blisters from inadequate straps, or even foot pain from a lack of cushioning and arch support, turning a pleasant walk in the park into an ordeal.
The ideal customer for this type of product is someone seeking all-day comfort for low-impact activities like city sightseeing, running errands, or enjoying a garden barbecue. They prioritise cushioning and a forgiving fit over rugged, all-terrain performance. However, this type of sandal might not be suitable for those who engage in serious hiking, need significant ankle support, or have very narrow feet that might feel lost in a roomier design. For intense trail walking, a dedicated hiking sandal from a brand like Teva would be a better choice. For those who just want something to slip on by the pool, a simple slide might suffice. It’s about matching the shoe’s design philosophy to your lifestyle.
Before investing, consider these crucial points in detail:
- Fit & Sizing: This is the most critical factor. Look for features like adjustable straps (at the heel, instep, and forefoot) for a customised fit. Pay attention to brand-specific sizing technologies, like Skechers’ “Relaxed Fit,” which is designed to offer more room. If you have narrow feet, this could be a drawback, leading to a “sloppy” feel, whereas those with wider feet may find it a perfect solution.
- Cushioning & Performance: The insole is the heart of a comfort sandal. Memory foam offers exceptional initial softness and molds to your foot shape, providing a plush feel. However, consider its long-term performance. Some memory foam can compress over time or wear down quickly with heavy use, diminishing its supportive qualities. A rubber or synthetic sole with a good tread pattern is essential for grip on various surfaces, from pavement to wet tiles.
- Materials & Durability: The materials dictate both comfort and lifespan. Synthetic uppers, like those on the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal, are lightweight and require no break-in, but can vary wildly in quality. Check how the straps are stitched to the sole and read feedback on material longevity. A common failure point in sandals is the glue holding the layers of the sole together, which can degrade, especially in high heat or humidity.
- Ease of Use & Maintenance: A good sandal should be effortless. A hook-and-loop closure system allows for quick adjustments and easy removal. Consider how easy the sandal will be to clean. Synthetic materials can typically be wiped down, but the fabric lining of a footbed can absorb sweat and dirt, requiring more care to keep fresh over the long term.
Choosing the right sandal is about balancing these factors to find the perfect companion for your summer adventures.
While the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal is an excellent choice for a specific type of user, it’s always wise to see how it stacks up against the competition. For a broader look at all the top models, we highly recommend checking out our complete, in-depth guide:
First Impressions: Unboxing the Gander-Louden
The Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal arrived in the brand’s standard, unassuming box. Upon opening it, the first thing I noticed was the weight—or lack thereof. At just over 272 grams, these sandals feel incredibly light, a definite plus for all-day wear and packing for holidays. The Brown (BRN) synthetic upper has a soft, slightly textured finish that mimics nubuck leather without the associated maintenance or water-sensitivity. The overall construction felt solid enough for a casual sandal, with neat stitching and no obvious cosmetic flaws.
The most prominent feature, of course, is the footbed. Pressing a thumb into the Memory Foam insole, I felt the signature slow-rebound cushioning that Skechers is renowned for. It felt plush and promised immediate comfort. The “Relaxed Fit” was also apparent as soon as I slipped them on; there was ample room in the toe box area, creating an open and unrestrictive feel. The hook-and-loop straps at the heel and over the instep felt secure and easy to operate. My initial thought was that this was a sandal built purely for comfort, designed to be a soft, forgiving home for your feet during casual summer days. You can see its full feature set and user reviews to get a better sense of its design.
What We Like
- Exceptional out-of-the-box comfort due to the Memory Foam insole
- Very lightweight design makes them easy to wear all day
- “Relaxed Fit” is excellent for those with wider feet
- Adjustable hook-and-loop straps offer convenience
What We Didn’t Like
- Significant concerns about long-term durability of the sole and footbed
- Straps can cause chafing and blisters during the break-in period
- Fit can be too loose or “sloppy” for those with narrow feet
A Deep Dive into the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal’s Performance
A sandal’s worth is only truly known after miles of walking on varied terrain, in different conditions. We put the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal through its paces, wearing it for city walks, trips to the supermarket, and long afternoons in the garden. Our findings reveal a sandal that excels in one area but falters significantly in another, creating a complex picture for potential buyers.
The Memory Foam Experience: A Double-Edged Sword of Comfort
Let’s start with the headline feature: the Memory Foam footbed. From the very first step, the comfort is undeniable. It’s a soft, cloud-like sensation that cushions the foot beautifully. For someone suffering from neuropathy or simply tired, aching feet, this initial feeling is a revelation. One user purchased them for his son who wears a size 15, noting it was the “first time he’s been able to wear sandals for an extended period,” freeing him from sneakers. This perfectly encapsulates the primary appeal of the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal. It makes walking more palatable, absorbing the shock from hard pavement and providing a gentle platform for your foot.
However, this profound initial comfort is, for many, fleeting. Through our testing, and corroborated by a wealth of user feedback, we found that the Memory Foam and the footbed material itself are the shoe’s Achilles’ heel. One user stated that “the bottom at the ball of my foot has worn smooth in just over a month and the heel of the foot bed had worn thru.” Another reported a more catastrophic failure: after less than six months of light weekend use, the fabric on the footpad tore, causing blisters on the bottom of his foot and rendering the sandals “unwearable.” This is the critical trade-off. The very softness that makes the sandal so appealing also seems to contribute to its rapid decline. The foam compresses and the fabric liner simply isn’t robust enough for sustained use, creating a sandal that might not even last a single full summer of regular wear. It’s a feature that promises luxury but, in many cases, delivers a disappointingly short-lived experience.
Fit and Adjustability: The “Relaxed Fit” Conundrum
Skechers’ “Relaxed Fit” technology is designed to provide a roomier experience, particularly in the toe box and forefoot. For individuals with wider feet, this is a game-changer. It eliminates the pinching and cramping that can occur with standard-fit footwear. Combined with the hook-and-loop straps, the design aims to offer a secure yet spacious fit. One happy customer noted that the sandals come in a “huge variety of sizes, so both the slim and the bulky can wear them snuggly.” This highlights the potential for a great fit when the foot shape aligns with the design.
Unfortunately, this same feature creates significant problems for those with average to narrow feet. We found the fit to be overly generous, and the adjustability of the straps was more limited than we’d like. This sentiment was strongly echoed by other users. One person with a “somewhat narrow foot” described the “relaxed fit” as a “bit of a sloppy fit.” Another went further, stating, “I tighten it maxed in all sides but they don’t tighten enough…when I walk, I have a gap in the back and loose heel which makes it a bit awkward.” This loose feeling negates the security that a fisherman sandal is supposed to provide. Furthermore, the straps themselves can be problematic. The synthetic material, while soft on top, has edges that can be abrasive. We experienced some mild chafing, and other users reported more severe issues, with one noting the “thick-edged” straps can “cut into the skin” and require weeks of wear with band-aids to break in. This makes the fit a real gamble: a perfect solution for some, but a loose, uncomfortable problem for many others.
Built to Last? A Frank Look at Durability and Materials
When you purchase a pair of sandals, you expect them to carry you through at least one full season, if not more. Regrettably, the most consistent and concerning feedback regarding the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal revolves around its poor durability. While the synthetic outer material and rubber sole are standard for this price point, the execution and quality of the components seem to be lacking. Our test pair held up during our relatively short testing period, but the sheer volume of user complaints points to a systemic issue.
The reports are alarming. One user stated bluntly, “The sole collapsed within 3 months.” Another, after nine months of what they described as “normal use,” was replacing them because the soles had “worn to nearly a hole” and the inner surface was “falling apart with entire chunks breaking off.” Even environmental factors seem to pose a challenge. A user with a second home in Central America found that after leaving the sandals in the tropical climate, the “soles completely detached,” suggesting the glue used is not resistant to high humidity. This isn’t a sandal built for rugged adventures or even demanding daily use. It appears to be a comfort-focused product where longevity was a distant secondary consideration. If you need something for occasional, light use for a short period, it might suffice. But if you’re looking for a dependable summer staple, the evidence strongly suggests you will be disappointed and looking for a replacement far sooner than you’d expect.
What Other Users Are Saying
Across the board, reviews for the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal paint a picture of a product that elicits both delight and frustration. The positive feedback almost universally centres on the immediate comfort. One glowing review came from the wife of a man who wears a size 16, who called them the “most comfortable sandals he has ever owned.” Another user, who bought them as a gift for his father, simply said they were a “Perfecto y cómodo” fit. These comments highlight that for the right person—often someone with larger or wider feet seeking maximum cushioning—these sandals can feel like a dream come true.
However, the negative feedback is just as passionate and focuses on two critical flaws: chafing and durability. One user’s experience was particularly stark: “Very painful on my toe next to little toe, it has rubbed the skin off after wearing for 15 minutes.” This speaks to the abrasive nature of the strap materials that we also noticed. The durability complaints are even more widespread and severe. Reports of the “sole collapsed within 3 months,” the footbed fabric tearing and causing blisters, and the sole wearing through in a single month are common. As one user aptly summarised, “I would not suggest this shoe unless you just need something for a short period and accept you will be tossing them soon after.” This divided opinion is key: the sandals deliver on the promise of comfort, but for many, that comfort has an unacceptably short expiration date. You can check the latest price and availability here.
How Does the Skechers Gander-Louden Compare to the Alternatives?
No product exists in a vacuum. To truly understand the value of the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal, we need to place it alongside its key competitors. Each alternative serves a slightly different purpose and will appeal to a different user.
1. Teva Hudson Men’s Hiking Sandals
The Teva Hudson represents a significant step up in terms of ruggedness and durability. Where the Skechers Gander-Louden prioritises soft, plush comfort, the Teva Hudson is built for the trail. Its sole is tougher and more aggressively treaded for superior grip on uneven terrain, and its overall construction is far more robust. The footbed is supportive but firm, lacking the “walking-on-a-cloud” feel of the Skechers’ Memory Foam. Someone should choose the Teva Hudson if their summer plans involve light hiking, walking on rocky beaches, or any activity where durability and traction are more important than maximum cushioning. It’s the practical, long-lasting choice for the more active user.
2. Teva M Omnium 2 Hiking Boots
The Teva M Omnium 2 is less a direct competitor and more a different category of footwear altogether. It’s a hybrid water shoe and closed-toe sandal. The key difference is the substantial toe protection, which makes it ideal for activities like kayaking, river walking, or navigating environments with loose rocks. It offers a much more secure, shoe-like fit than the open design of the Skechers Gander-Louden. A user should opt for the Omnium 2 if their priority is foot protection and performance in wet conditions. It sacrifices the open-air breeziness of the Skechers for a design that can handle much more demanding and unpredictable environments.
3. Crocs Unisex Slide Sandal
At the other end of the spectrum lies the Crocs Slide. This alternative strips the sandal concept down to its bare essentials: convenience and water-friendly comfort. It forgoes the multiple adjustment straps and secure fit of the Skechers Gander-Louden in favour of a simple, slip-on design. Made entirely from Croslite material, it’s waterproof, incredibly easy to clean, and lightweight. The Crocs Slide is the perfect choice for the poolside, the beach, or for quick trips into the garden. A buyer would choose this over the Skechers if their primary need is for a casual, waterproof, no-fuss shoe and they don’t require the secure fit needed for extended walking.
Our Final Verdict: A Sandal of Comfort and Compromise
After extensive testing and analysis, our verdict on the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal is one of significant compromise. There is no denying the appeal of its initial comfort. The Memory Foam footbed is exceptionally plush, and for those with wider feet, the “Relaxed Fit” can provide a level of comfort that is hard to find elsewhere. It’s lightweight, easy to put on, and carries the reputable Skechers name.
However, we cannot look past the overwhelming evidence of its critical durability flaws. From soles detaching to footbeds disintegrating after just a few months of light use, these sandals are simply not built to last. The comfort it provides is, for too many users, temporary. We can only recommend the Skechers Gander-Louden Fisherman Sandal to those who will use it very sparingly for non-demanding activities, or to individuals who prioritise immediate, supreme cushioning above all else and are willing to replace their footwear frequently. For anyone seeking a reliable, all-summer walking sandal, there are more durable and ultimately more valuable options on the market. If you fit the narrow profile of an ideal user and understand the limitations, you can find the best deal on them here.